Sobrinho v. ADP, Inc.
Plaintiff: Marcello Sobrinho
Defendant: ADP, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv00295
Filed: April 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kyle C Dudek
Referring Judge: John E Steele
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER granting #16 Motion for David W. Schelberg to specially appear to represent Defendant, which complies with Local Rule 2.01(c). Unless non-resident attorney Schelberg already has CM/ECF filing credentials for the Middle District of Florida, he shall submit an E-Filer Registration Form within fourteen days of the date of this order. Failure to complete this step may cause the court to revoke its permission to appear specially without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 6/23/2023. (BLW)
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 Motion for James J. Boutrous, II to specially appear to represent Defendant, which complies with Local Rule 2.01(c). Unless non-resident attorney Boutrous already has CM/ECF filing credentials for the Middle District of Florida, he shall submit an E-Filer Registration Form within fourteen days of the date of this order. Failure to complete this step may cause the court to revoke its permission to appear specially without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 6/23/2023. (BLW)
June 23, 2023 Filing 16 Amended MOTION for David W. Schelberg to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20972355 for $150 by ADP, Inc.. (Distel, Craig) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
June 23, 2023 Filing 15 Amended MOTION for James J. Boutrous, II to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20972322 for $150 by ADP, Inc.. (Distel, Craig) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
June 23, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 8/7/2023 at 10:00 AM via Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. Case Management Report due by 8/1/2023. Zoom instructions will be sent by separate email to counsel of record. (CGW)
June 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER denying #11, #12 Defendant's Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice because they rely on outdated Local Rules. Defendant may resubmit the motions in compliance with Local Rule 2.01(c). Further, designation of local counsel is no longer required and no proposed order may be submitted without leave of court. See Local Rule 3.01(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 6/22/2023. (BLW)
June 22, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION for David W. Schelberg to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20968950 for $150 by ADP, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(Distel, Craig) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
June 22, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION for James J. Boutrous, II to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20968878 for $150 by ADP, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(Distel, Craig) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
June 22, 2023 Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by ADP, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Automatic Data Processing, Inc. for ADP, Inc... (Distel, Craig)
June 22, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Craig Stuart Distel on behalf of ADP, Inc.. Lead Counsel: Craig S. Distel. (Distel, Craig)
June 22, 2023 Filing 8 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by ADP, Inc..(Distel, Craig)
April 28, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to ADP, Inc. (JK)
April 28, 2023 Filing 6 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 4/28/2023. (JK)
April 27, 2023 Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John E. Steele and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:23-cv-295-JES-KCD. (AET)
April 27, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Benjamin H. Yormak on behalf of Marcello Sobrinho. Lead Counsel: Benjamin H. Yormak, Esq. (Yormak, Benjamin)
April 27, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Marcello Sobrinho. (Yormak, Benjamin)
April 27, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Marcello Sobrinho. Related case(s): No (Yormak, Benjamin)
April 27, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADP, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20774831) filed by Marcello Sobrinho. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Yormak, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sobrinho v. ADP, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcello Sobrinho
Represented By: Benjamin H. Yormak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADP, Inc.
Represented By: Craig Stuart Distel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?