Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
| Jean Cenecharl |
| Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins, Lt. Conner, Ms. Roberts and Ricky Dixon |
| 2:2023cv00535 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| John E Steele |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER directing the Clerk to docket Cenecharl's #1 complaint as an amended complaint in Case No. 2:23-cv-351-SPC-NPM and to close this case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/24/2023. (RKR)
|
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/21/2023. (WRW) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/21/2023. (WRW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jean Cenecharl. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JGG) |
| Filing 2 Rule 7.1 and Local Rule 3.03 Disclosure Statement by Jean Cenecharl. (JGG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2023: #1 Mailing Envelope) (JGG). Modified to add envelope on 7/20/2023 (JGG). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins, Lt. Conner, and Ms. Roberts with Jury Demand, filed by Jean Cenecharl. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JGG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
