Mercola v. The New York Times Company
Dr. Joseph Mercola |
The New York Times Company |
2:2023cv00545 |
July 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Kyle C Dudek |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Joseph Mercola. (Medina, Eric) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Steven Medina on behalf of Joseph Mercola (Medina, Eric) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Steven Medina on behalf of Joseph Mercola (Medina, Eric) |
Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Joseph Mercola. (Wicklund, P.) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by P. Renee Wicklund on behalf of Joseph Mercola. Lead Counsel: P. Rene Wicklund. (Wicklund, P.) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by P. Renee Wicklund on behalf of Joseph Mercola (Wicklund, P.) |
Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER granting #13 Motion for P. Renee Wicklund to specially appear to represent Plaintiff, which complies with Local Rule 2.01(c). Unless non-resident attorney Wicklund already has CM/ECF filing credentials for the Middle District of Florida, she shall submit an E-Filer Registration Form within fourteen days of the date of this order. Failure to complete this step may cause the court to revoke its permission to appear specially without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 8/17/2023. (BLW) |
Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for P. Renee Wicklund to appear pro hac vice by Joseph Mercola. (Medina, Eric) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #10 Plaintiff's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for failure to comply with Local Rule 2.01(c). This is the second time Plaintiff's motion has been denied on this basis. Local Rule 2.01(c)(4) states that a motion must "list[] each case in state or federal court in Florida in which the lawyer has initially appeared in the last thirty-six months." The motion fails to do so. If counsel has appeared in no cases, they must say so. Otherwise, the cases must be listed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 8/4/2023. (BLW) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for P. Renee Wicklund to appear pro hac vice by Joseph Mercola. (Medina, Eric) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #7 Motion for Attorney P. Renee Wicklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice for failure to comply with Local Rule 2.01(c)(4). Future filings must comply with the typography requirements of Local Rule 1.08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 8/1/2023. (BLW) |
Filing 8 WAIVER of service returned executed on July 28, 2023 by Joseph Mercola as to The New York Times Company. (Medina, Eric) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for P. Renee Wicklund to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-21098719 for $150 by Joseph Mercola. (Medina, Eric) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
Filing 6 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/25/2023. (CGW) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL P. Renee Wicklund Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LNR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LNR) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to The New York Times Company. (LNR) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:23-cv-545-SPC-KCD. (RPB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Defamation/Libel against The New York Times Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21069149) filed by Joseph Mercola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet JS44, #5 Proposed Summons)(Medina, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mercola v. The New York Times Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dr. Joseph Mercola | |
Represented By: | Eric Steven Medina |
Represented By: | P. Renee Wicklund |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The New York Times Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.