Compton v. Nachtsheim
| Michael Compton |
| Henry Nachsheim and Henry Nachtsheim |
| 2:2023cv00589 |
| August 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. #4) and for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and terminate all deadlines. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/13/2023. (CMC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. By September 8, 2023, Compton must either (a) file a notice of voluntary dismissal or (b) pay the filing fee and file an amended complaint that properly alleges the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 8/9/2023. (BB)
|
| Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 8/4/2023. (WRW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Compton. (JGG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Henry Nachtsheim with Jury Demand filed by Michael Compton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JGG) Modified on 8/4/2023 to edit docket text (AJS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
