Campbell v. State of Florida Department of Corrections
Remoi Campbell |
State of Florida Department of Corrections |
2:2023cv00671 |
August 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
John L Badalamenti |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment against State of Florida Department of Corrections by Remoi Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 8 RESPONSE re #6 Order Dismissing Case filed by Remoi Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
Filing 7 JUDGMENT in favor of defendant against plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ARL) |
Filing 6 ORDER dismissing case. 1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, terminate any pending motions, and close the file. Plaintiff is not assessed a filing fee for this action. 3. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form, instructions, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner filings). If Plaintiff chooses to refile his claims, he may complete and submit the appropriate forms to the Jacksonville Division of the Middle District of Florida. Plaintiff should not place this case number on the forms because this case will be closed. The Clerk will assign a separate case number if Plaintiff elects to refile his claims. Along with his complaint, Plaintiff must either file a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402 filing fee. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 9/19/2023. (BGS) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #2 Civil Action Order by Remoi Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Remoi Campbell. Related case(s): No (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 8/30/2023. (WRW) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff Signed by All Divisional Judges on 8/30/2023. (WRW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Florida Department of Corrections filed by Remoi Campbell. "No IFP" (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Campbell v. State of Florida Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Remoi Campbell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State of Florida Department of Corrections | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.