Depaola v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
| Kristin Depaola |
| The Proctor & Gamble Company, McNeil Consumer Healthcare and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00727 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting the joint stipulation to restyle the case and stay proceedings (Doc. 10). The Clerk is DIRECTED to amend the docket header by replacing defendant "McNeil Consumer Healthcare" with defendant "Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc." The Clerk is also DIRECTED to add a stay flag to the file. This case is STAYED pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's decision on the motion to transfer. The parties must file a status report within 14 days of the JPML's decision. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/12/2023. (BB)
|
| Case Stayed. (JDR) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Regarding Stay of all Proceedings Pending JPML Determination and as to McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Substitution of Party Name and Amendment to Caption by McNeil Consumer Healthcare. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Berman, Bruce) Modified on 10/12/2023 to edit docket text (JDR). Modified on 10/12/2023 (BB). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to McNeil Consumer Healthcare, The Proctor & Gamble Company. (ARL) |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Kristin Depaola. (Williamson, George) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Kristin Depaola. (Williamson, George) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by George T. Williamson on behalf of Kristin Depaola. Lead Counsel: George T. Williamson. (Williamson, George) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 9/14/2023. (CGW) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL George T. Williamson of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SPM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Ruben Honik, David J. Stanoch, Marlene J. Goldenberg, and Conlee S. Whiteley Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details The attorney listed shall file a notice of compliance within fourteen days. Failure to comply with this notice within fourteen days will result in counsel being terminated from the docket sheet without further notice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SPM) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:23-cv-727-SPC-KCD. (AA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21243809) filed by Kristin Depaola. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williamson, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
