Morales v. Charlotte Correctional Institution
| Eddie N. Morales |
| Charlotte Correctional Institution |
| 2:2023cv00777 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 11/17/2023. (BGS)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eddie N. Morales. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/18/2023. (LSS) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eddie N. Morales. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Eddie N. Morales. Related case(s): No. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Modified text on 10/17/2023 (GL). |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Eddie N. Morales. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, terminate any pending motions, and close the file. Plaintiff is not assessed a filing fee for this action. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form, instructions, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner filings). If Plaintiff chooses to refile his claims, he may complete and submit the appropriate forms. Plaintiff should not place this case number on the forms because this case will be closed. The Clerk will assign a separate case number if Plaintiff elects to refile his claims. Along with his complaint, Plaintiff must either file a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402 filing fee. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 10/16/2023. (BGS)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 9/29/2023. (CGW) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 9/29/2023. (CGW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charlotte Correctional Institution filed by Eddie N. Morales. Fee DUE, No IFP Filed, Zero (0) service copies received. (Attachments: #1 Composite Exhibits, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morales v. Charlotte Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eddie N. Morales | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charlotte Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
