D'Arrigo et al v. First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance
Paula D'Arrigo and Glenn D'Arrigo |
First Protective Insurance Company doing business as Frontline Insurance |
2:2023cv00867 |
October 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by First Protective Insurance Company.(Unzicker, John) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by First Protective Insurance Company. (Unzicker, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 6 PROOF of service by Glenn D'Arrigo, Paula D'Arrigo (de las Salas, Gabriel) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to First Protective Insurance Company. (JDR) |
![]() |
Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/11/2023. (WRW) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:23-cv-00867-SPC-NPM. (JG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21338403) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declarations Page, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(de las Salas, Gabriel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.