Verduyn et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
| Simon Verduyn and Elsie Verduyn |
| Wright National Flood Insurance Company |
| 2:2023cv00914 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Elsie Verduyn, Simon Verduyn. (Vinson, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/20/2023. (WRW) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Wright National Flood Insurance Company. (HAI) |
| REFUND for duplicate payment. Receipt number AFLMDC-21369635 refunded in the amount of $ $402.00 paid to Donna Stockham.. (NLC) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Elsie Verduyn, Simon Verduyn. (Vinson, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:23-cv-914-SPC-NPM. (AET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wright National Flood Insurance Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21369641) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: policy, #2 Exhibit B: Wright Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Vinson, Nicole) Modified on 10/19/2023 (CTR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
