Adkins v. Charlotte C.I. et al
| Kenneth McClellen Adkins |
| Charlotte C.I., Dr. Noe, Centurion Medical and F.D.O.C. Tallahassee |
| 2:2024cv00199 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
OPINION AND ORDER re: #1 Complaint. Plaintiff Kenneth McClellen Adkins' Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Adkins may file an amended complaint by May 3, 2024. Otherwise, the Court will enter judgment and close this case without further notice. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/15/2024. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. But Adkins is ultimately responsible for the total $350 filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to the Charlotte County Jail, Inmate Trust Department. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 4/11/2024. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kenneth McClellen Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
|
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting Plaintiff Kenneth McClellen Adkin's Request for Extension of Time to Provide Six Month Deposit History Documentation (Doc. #6). McClellen must file a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required account statement, by April 22, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 3/20/2024. (NMC)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Kenneth McClellen Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kenneth McClellen Adkins. Related case(s): No (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File six months deposit history documentation by Kenneth McClellen Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. By March 21, 2024, Adkins must either (a) file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by the required six-month account statement, or (b) pay the $402 filing fee. Failure to timely and fully comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case. The clerk is directed to send Adkins an "Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas)" form bearing the above-captioned case number. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 3/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 AO 239 IFP) (BGS)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/6/2024. (CGW)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/6/2024. (CGW)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kenneth McClellen Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Centurion Medical, Charlotte C.I., F.D.O.C. Tallahassee, Noe filed by Kenneth McClellen Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
