Escobar v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Amelia Escobar |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union LLC and Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC |
2:2024cv00470 |
May 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Kyle C Dudek |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:24-cv-470-SPC-KCD. (RLK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Catherine Tillman on behalf of Amelia Escobar. Lead Counsel: Catherine Tillman. (Tillman, Catherine) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, Trans Union LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22115012) filed by Amelia Escobar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, #4 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Trans Union LLC, #5 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC)(Tillman, Catherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.