Smith v. Solorzano
Darrell Eugene Smith |
R. Solorzano |
2:2024cv00511 |
May 31, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
John L Badalamenti |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AM) |
Filing 9 JUDGMENT that claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. All remaining state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling them in state court. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 7/29/2024. (AM) |
Filing 8 ORDER dismissing case. 1. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 2. All remaining state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling them in state court. 3. With no remaining claims or defendants, the Clerk is DIRECTED to deny any pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, close this case, and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 7/25/2024. (BGS) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to the Court Order to Respond to the Court by Darrell Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Civil Action Order by Darrell Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Darrell Eugene Smith. Related case(s): No (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/12/2024. (WRW) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/12/2024. (WRW) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Darrell Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Affidavit, #3 Affidavit Attachment)(JTM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. Solorzano filed by Darrell Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Solorzano | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: R. Solorzano | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darrell Eugene Smith | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.