Malhotra v. Kumar et al
Plaintiff: Jeevan Malhotra and M. Jeevan Prakash
Defendant: Ajay Kumar, Ajit Kumar, Raj Kumar, Renu Kumar and Vijay Kumar
Case Number: 2:2024cv00945
Filed: October 9, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referring Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER re: #1 Complaint. Plaintiff Jeevan Malhotra's Complaint (Doc. #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and improper venue. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before December 20, 2024. Failure to do so will cause the Court to close this case without further notice. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/4/2024. (LF)
December 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER. Plaintiff filed proof of service as to all defendants that is improper because it does not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. As such, the proof of service is deemed stricken, and the clerk is directed to delete the PDF file (Doc. 8) from the CM/ECF docket. Plaintiff has until January 29, 2025 to serve each defendant in accordance with Rule 4(e) (which does not provide for service by mail or FedEx) and to file an appropriate waiver or return of executed service in accordance with Rule 4(l)(1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/2/2024. (TLP)
November 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (STRICKEN per 9 Order) PROOF of service by FedEx and US Certified mail as to all defendants by Jeevan Malhotra. (e-portal) (JK) Modified docket text on 12/3/2024 (EVK).
October 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to Ajay Kumar, Ajit Kumar, Raj Kumar, Renu Kumar, Vijay Kumar. (JK)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER directing the clerk to strike and delete from the CM/ECF docket the exhibits attached to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1-1) because they contain personal identifying information regarding the Defendants. If Plaintiff feels the exhibits are essential to his Complaint, he may refile the documents under seal or refile with redactions consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/25/2024. (JMM)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order FEES Paid by Jeevan Malhotra (Filing fee $405, Receipt Number 16797). (ABM)
October 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 plaintiff's motion to receive notices by electronic service. The clerk is directed to add plaintiff's email to the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 10/24/2024. (TLP)
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Jeevan Malhotra. (e-portal//not issued - payment pending) (JK)
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically electronic access/notification to CM/ECF by Jeevan Malhotra. (e-portal) (JK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell.
October 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/15/2024. (WRW)
October 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ajay Kumar, Ajit Kumar, Raj Kumar, Renu Kumar, Vijay Kumar filed by Jeevan Malhotra. (e-portal // filing fee due)) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malhotra v. Kumar et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeevan Malhotra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M. Jeevan Prakash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ajay Kumar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ajit Kumar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raj Kumar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Renu Kumar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vijay Kumar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?