Truesdale v. Securus Technologies, LLC et al
| William James Truesdale |
| JPay, LLC, Unknown, Lieutenant J. Conner, Securus Technologies, LLC, T. Bowden, A. Johns, Ms. Lori Norwood, Ricky D Dixon and Sargeant S. Jaromillo |
| 2:2024cv01063 |
| November 20, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (FLY) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT - Plaintiff's second amended civil rights complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (FLY) Modified on 1/16/2025 to edit text (FLY) |
Filing 10
ORDER dismissing case. 1. Plaintiff's second amended civil rights complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close this file. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 1/14/2025. (BGS)
|
| Filing 9 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by William James Truesdale. Related document: #6 Amended Complaint filed by William James Truesdale. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by William James Truesdale. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by William James Truesdale. Related case(s): No (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by William James Truesdale. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by William James Truesdale. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William James Truesdale. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope) (FLY) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON AN APPROVED FORM. 1. Plaintiff shall complete the enclosed form and return it to the Court no later than January 2, 2025. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this Order and a blank civil rights complaint form bearing the above-captioned case number and the title "Amended Complaint." 3. The Court warns Plaintiff that failure to comply with this Order or failure to respond fully and accurately to each of the questions in the civil rights complaint form may result in a dismissal of this action without further notice for failure to prosecute. Amended Complaint due by 1/2/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 12/13/2024. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(BGS)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 11/25/2024. (CGW) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 11/25/2024. (CGW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by William James Truesdale. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index, #2 Attachment, #3 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.