Osceola et al v. Forsyth et al
| Jessica Osceola and Todd Kevin Osceola |
| Pedro Ramos, Thomas Forsyth and U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service |
| 2:2024cv01131 |
| December 11, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Torts to Land |
| 25 U.S.C. ยง 640 Indian Tribal Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on 01/28/2025 by Todd Kevin Osceola, Jessica Osceola as to Pedro Ramos. (Pizzi, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service. (EVK) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Todd Kevin Osceola, Jessica Osceola. (Pizzi, Michael) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/12/2024. (CGW) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Thomas Forsyth, Pedro Ramos. (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:24-cv-01131-SPC-KCD. (JOS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22806974) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Pizzi, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
