Raczkowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Louann Loucille Raczkowski
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 2:2024cv01156
Filed: December 18, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2025 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Windham, Robert)
January 6, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commissioner of Social Security. Related case(s): Yes (Windham, Robert)
January 6, 2025 Filing 8 Notice of substitution of AUSA and Lead Counsel Designation. Robert Dalton Windham substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder. (Windham, Robert) Modified on 1/7/2025 as to docket text (ARL).
December 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/23/2024. (WRW)
December 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 plaintiff's application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs. The court has reviewed the application submitted by plaintiff under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and finds plaintiff qualifies to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed without paying the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/20/2024. (RCD)
December 18, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Louann Loucille Raczkowski. Related case(s): Yes (Avard, Carol)
December 18, 2024 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Louann Loucille Raczkowski. (Avard, Carol)
December 18, 2024 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:24-cv-1156-NPM. (RLK)
December 18, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Louann Loucille Raczkowski. (Avard, Carol)
December 18, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Louann Loucille Raczkowski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Avard, Carol)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raczkowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Represented By: Robert Dalton Windham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Louann Loucille Raczkowski
Represented By: Carol Ann Avard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?