Symonette v. Galmarini et al
| Vedrick LaMonte Symonette |
| Dr. Maria Galmarini, Dr. Ralph D. Richardson, Judge Zachary C Bolitho, Judge Wendy W. Berger, Judge T. Kent Wetherell, II, Jonathan A. Heller, Pamela Bondi, Jessica J. Lyublanovits, Tiann Stark, World Liberty Financial, Sgt. Sargeant, Sgt. B. Davis, Officer Emily Thurman, Lt. Taylor, Sgt. Cotton, Individual Master File, Officer J. Norton, Sgt. Richard, Lieutenant Wilkson, Lt. Morgan, Ms. Thornton, Officer Lapau, Officer Shores, Officer T. Copes, Officer M.G. Miller, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Carona, Captain Johnson, Insurance Commissioner of Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis, Jimmy Patronis, Ashley Moody, Daniel Palardy, Ryan Dean Newman, Judge Kathleen M. Williams, Sandra Lipman, Katherine Fernandez Rundle, Judge Diane Ward, Harvey Ruvin, Ricky D. Dixon, Lt. Hott, Florida Department of Legal Affairs, United States Marshals, State of Florida and United States of America |
| 2:2025cv00048 |
| January 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Vedrick LaMonte Symonette. ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Vedrick L. Symonette has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules. EOD: 03/13/2025; Issued as mandate. USCA number: 25-10527-J. (JK)
|
| Filing 7 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #6 Notice of Appeal. (JK) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order Dismissing Case, #4 Judgment - Prisoner by Vedrick LaMonte Symonette. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (FLY) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT - Plaintiff's second amended civil rights complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (FLY) |
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case. 1. Plaintiff's second amended civil rights complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close this file. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 2/5/2025. (BGS)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Vedrick LaMonte Symonette. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, titled as Writ of Replevin, against All Defendants filed by Vedrick LaMonte Symonette. (IFP Pending - Zero service copies received) (Attachments: #1 Composite Exhibits, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.