Merritt v. Baker
| Kengi N. Merritt |
| Warden Shane Baker |
| 2:2025cv00315 |
| April 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE to the Clerk re: #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kengi N. Merritt (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (FLY)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kengi N. Merritt. Related case(s): No (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (only pages 8 - 9 provided) (FLY)
|
|
Filing 11
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Kengi N. Merritt. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (only pages 4 - 7 provided) (FLY)
|
|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT is entered denying petition (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ARL)
|
|
Filing 9
OPINION AND ORDER re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Merritt's petition is DENIED as successive. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any deadlines, enter judgment, and close this case. If the Eleventh Circuit authorizes a successive habeas petition, Merritt must file it in the West Palm Beach Division of the Southern District of Florida, because that court serves the county where he was convicted. Merritt may not have a certificate of appealability on his petition. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/22/2025. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Kengi N. Merritt. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kengi N. Merritt. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE by Kengi N. Merritt (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 5
CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff. Signed by all Judges of Division on 4/21/2025. (AEH)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER regarding habeas petition. Signed by all District Judges of Division on 4/21/2025. (AEH)
|
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER granting the petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 4/21/2025. (NMC)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kengi N. Merritt. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(FLY) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State filed by Kengi N. Merritt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Mailing Envelope) (No service copies provided) (FLY)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Merritt v. Baker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kengi N. Merritt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Shane Baker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
