Perry v. Steinbeck et al
| Kendrick Perry |
| Judge Margaret O. Steinbeck, Judge Andrew Marcus, Judge Devin S. George, Probation Officer Adam W. Harvin, Stephanie C. Russell, Alexis G. Adams, Deputy J. Tolley and Kathleen M.L. Walther |
| 2:2025cv00340 |
| April 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot plaintiff Kendrick Perry's Motion and Affidavit to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #10) because the Court already granted Perry leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. #7), dismissed this action for failure to state a claim, (Doc. #8), and entered judgment, (Doc. #9). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 5/27/2025. (NMC)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kendrick Perry. Related case(s): No (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Kendrick Perry. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
|
|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT dismissing this case (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ABM)
|
|
Filing 8
OPINION AND ORDER re: #1 Complaint. 1. Perry's claims against defendants Steinbeck, Marcus, George, Russell, and Adams are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Perry's claims against defendants Harvin, Walther, and Tolley are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, enter judgment, and close this case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/19/2025. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. As required by law, however, Perry is ultimately responsible for the total $350 filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Perry is ultimately responsible for payment of the filing fee if the agency with custody over him lapses in its duty to make payments on his behalf. If he is transferred to another facility, he must ensure that the new facility is informed about this case and the required monthly payments. He should keep a copy of this order for that purpose. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to the Lee County Jail, Inmate Trust Department. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 5/15/2025. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Kendrick Perry. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kendrick Perry. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kendrick Perry. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 4/25/2025. (CGW)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 4/25/2025. (CGW)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Kendrick Perry. "No IFP". (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
