Norfleet v. Department of Corrections et al
| Tino Avery Norfleet |
| Department of Corrections and Latricia A. Archie |
| 2:2025cv00425 |
| May 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| K C Dudek |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER of USCA as to #13 Notice of Appeal filed by Tino Avery Norfleet. EOD: 8/14/2025; USCA number: 25-12471-B. ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Tino Avery Norfleet has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules. (FLY)
|
| Filing 14 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #13 Notice of Appeal. (MCB) (Main Document 14 replaced to add documents on 7/22/2025) (MCB). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Judgment, #6 Order Dismissing Case, by Tino Avery Norfleet. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER of USCA as to #8 Notice of Appeal filed by Tino Avery Norfleet. EOD: 7/8/2025; USCA number: 25-12065. ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Tino Avery Norfleet has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules. (JTM)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Tino Avery Norfleet. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(FLY) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Tino Avery Norfleet. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(FLY) |
| Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #8 Notice of Appeal. (JKB) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Judgment, #6 Order Dismissing Case, by Tino Avery Norfleet. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (JKB) |
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT is entered dismissing this case without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Deputy Clerk on 6/6/2025. (JKB) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER dismissing case. Plaintiff's comlpaint is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, deny as moot any pending motions, and close the file. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 6/6/2025. (LTG)
|
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 5/23/2025. (CGW) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 5/23/2025. (CGW) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney from State Court case by Tino Avery Norfleet. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (FLY) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Tino Avery Norfleet. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(FLY) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Tino Avery Norfleet. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (No Service Copies provided)(FLY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
