Sanders v. Doe et al
| Christopher Sanders |
| Warden John Doe and Charlotte Correctional Institution |
| 2:2025cv00447 |
| May 27, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER. Christopher Sanders filed a Motion for Emergency TRO and Notice of Life in Imminent Danger (Doc. #1). The Court entered a standing order to address the claims of imminent harm. (See Doc. #2). But the motion is not a complaint and cannot commence a civil action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 3. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and send Sanders a civil-rights complaint form. Sanders may use the form to commence a civil action. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/28/2025. (NMC)
|
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER regarding Notification to Appropriate State or Federal Officials about a Confined Person's Claim of Suicide, Death, or Other Imminent Physical Harm. Signed by all Fort Myers Judges on 5/27/2025. (BGS) |
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND NOTICE OF LIFE IN IMMINENT DANGER as COMPLAINT against Charlotte Correctional Institution, John Doe filed by Christopher Sanders. (Note: Filing fee not paid. No IFP motion filed.) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.