Naples Screen Repair, LLC v. Naples Screens and More LLC et al
| Naples Screen Repair, LLC |
| Naples Screens and More LLC and Ryan Pippin |
| 2:2025cv00544 |
| June 23, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Douglas N Frazier |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Trademark Report electronically sent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (LNR) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2025: #1 Copy of Order). (LNR) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LNR) |
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER. Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service of the summons and complaint per Local Rule 1.10(a). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. See Local Rule 1.10(d); Doc. #6 at 2. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 10/16/2025. (BLW)
|
| Filing 11 Case Reassigned to Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:25-cv-544-KCD-DNF. Judge John L. Badalamenti no longer assigned to the case. (LMW) |
| Filing 10 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier. New case number: 2:25-cv-544-JLB-DNF. Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek no longer assigned to the case. (AJS) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Naples Screen Repair, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Doppelt, Ava) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Naples Screen Repair, LLC. (Doppelt, Ava) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Ava K. Doppelt on behalf of Naples Screen Repair, LLC. Lead Counsel: Ava K. Doppelt. (Doppelt, Ava) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/25/2025. (CGW) |
| Filing 5 Trademark Report electronically sent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (ABM) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Ava K. Doppelt, Trevor Frederick Ward of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ABM) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Naples Screens and More LLC, Ryan Pippin. (ABM) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John L. Badalamenti and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:25-cv-544-JLB-KCD. (EVK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Naples Screens and More LLC, Ryan Pippin with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-23514730) filed by Naples Screen Repair, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reg No. 5,897,324, #2 Exhibit B - 2/06/2025 C&D Letter to Naples Screens and More, #3 Exhibit C - Wegner Acknowledgment of C&D Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons to be issued to Defendants)(Doppelt, Ava) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
