Corbett v. Loukonen et al
| Joseph Michael Corbett, II |
| Judge Rachel Liu Loukonen, Judge Tracey L. Redd, Judge Swift, Judge Marcus, Detective Patrick C. Baricelli and Scott Perez Ramirez |
| 2:2025cv00692 |
| August 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER denying #8 plaintiff's motion to consolidate cases. Prior to the filing of this motion, this action was dismissed, and the case was closed. See Doc. #3. Signed by Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 9/19/2025. (BLW)
|
| Filing 13 Case Reassigned to Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:25-cv-692-KCD-NPM. Judge John L. Badalamenti no longer assigned to the case. (AJS) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Relocation to New York by Joseph Michael Corbett, II (ABM) |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER denying #10 plaintiff's motion for comprehensive criminal referral. Prior to the filing of this motion, this action was dismissed, and the case was closed. (Doc. #3). And plaintiff is reminded that Doc. 56 at 17-19 in Case No. 2:25-cv-132-JLB-NPM states that individuals cannot bring criminal charges. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 9/8/2025. (RCD) Modified on 9/8/2025 to correct typos. (RCD).
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Comprehensive Federal Criminal Referral by Joseph Michael Corbett, II. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to the Clerk by Joseph Michael Corbett, II. Received via Intake; no envelope. (FLY) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Joseph Michael Corbett, II. Received via Intake; no envelope. (FLY) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Systematic Criminal Conduct and Demand for Immediate Cessation re 6 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief by Joseph Michael Corbett, II. Received via Intake; no envelope. (FLY) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER denying #5 plaintiff's motion for global resolution. Prior to the filing of this motion, this action was dismissed, and the case was closed. See Doc. #3. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 8/22/2025. (RCD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Request for Global Resolution by Joseph Michael Corbett, II. Received via Intake; no envelope. (FLY) Modified on 8/22/2025 (WRW). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LNR) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The Court dismisses this case without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee or move to proceed without prepayment of costs. The Clerk is DIRECTED to deny any pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and close the case. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 8/13/2025.
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 8/11/2025. (WRW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Joseph Michael Corbett, II. (Attachments: #1 Addendum) No IFP or Service copies. Received via Intake; no envelope. (FLY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
