Kusaj v. Porter et al
Plaintiff: George Kusaj
Defendant: Judge Lisa Porter, Judge John Burns and State of Florida (Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court)
Case Number: 2:2025cv00865
Filed: September 30, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kyle C Dudek
Referring Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying #11 Motion to Reopen Case; denying as moot #13 Motion to Compel Service by the U.S. Marshal. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 12/23/2025. (CGW)
December 22, 2025 Filing 13 MOTION for Service by U.S. Marshall by George Kusaj. (Attachments: #1 Letter to the Clerk, #2 Mailing Envelope)(FLY)
December 22, 2025 Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by George Kusaj. (Attachments: #1 Letter to the Clerk, #2 Mailing Envelope)(FLY)
December 22, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION to Reopen Case and MOTION to Accept Disclosure Statement by George Kusaj. (Attachments: #1 Disclosure Statement, #2 Letter to the Clerk, #3 Mailing Envelope)(FLY)
November 17, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE of Judicial Retaliation and Interference by George Kusaj (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit G, #7 Exhibit H, #8 Letter to the Clerk, #9 Mailing Envelope) Exhibit "F" not received/labelled.(FLY)
November 13, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ABM)
November 13, 2025 Filing 8 JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice( Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ABM)
November 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 3.10. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close the case. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 11/13/2025. (CGW)
October 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Local Rule 3.03 requires that, with the first appearance, each party must file a disclosure statement using the standard form from the clerk or the court's website. Plaintiff failed to do so. By November 3, 2025, plaintiff must file his disclosure statement using the standard form, which can be found at: https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/form/disclosure-statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 10/20/2025. (TLP)
October 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER directing the clerk to add plaintiff George Kusaj's email address to the docket ([email protected]). All future notices of electronic filing will be sent to this email address. Kusaj must continually monitor this email account. The Clerk will no longer mail paper copies of our orders or notices to Kusaj. Defendants' filings will also be served on Kusaj via the CM/ECF system. Kusaj must immediately apprise the court of any change of email address, and he must promptly respond to notices of electronic filing as appropriate. A failure to do either may result in a dismissal without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 10/20/2025. (TLP)
October 2, 2025 Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by George Kusaj. (Attachments: #1 Letter to the Clerk, #2 Mailing Envelope) (FLY)
October 2, 2025 Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/2/2025. (FLY)
September 30, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by George Kusaj. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (FLY) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell.
September 30, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by George Kusaj. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Mailing Envelope) (FLY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kusaj v. Porter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Kusaj
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Lisa Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge John Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Florida (Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?