Howell v. Commissioner of Social Security
| John King Howell, IV |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2025cv01083 |
| November 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TDC) |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT dismissing complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (TDC) (Main Document 9 replaced on 3/5/2026) (TDC). |
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis as this case has been dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 3/2/2026. (TLP)
|
Filing 7
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending deadlines, and close the case. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 3/2/2026. (CGW)
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing plaintiff John King Howell, IV to file an amended complaint that comports with all the requirements of Rule 11 by February 23, 2026. Upon receipt of the amended complaint, the court will consider plaintiff's motion to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. A failure to fully comply with this order or timely seek relief from it may result in a dismissal of the action without prejudice and without further notice. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 2/9/2026. (TLP)
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER. A unilateral notice of consent to a magistrate judge's authority was filed in this matter on behalf of pro se plaintiff John King Howell, IV, but the notice was not signed by plaintiff. Instead, it was signed by his mother, Patricia Howell. However, plaintiff's mother is not an attorney nor does she have legal representation, so she cannot file pleadings or other documents on behalf of her son. See FuQua v. Massey, 615 F. App'x 611, 612 (11th Cir. 2015) (explaining the right to appear pro se "is limited to parties conducting their own cases and does not extend to non-attorney parties representing the interests of others"). Therefore, the notice is deemed stricken, and the CLERK is DIRECTED to delete the PDF file (Doc. 4) from the CM/ECF docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/17/2025. (TLP)
|
| Filing 4 ***STRICKEN PER TEXT ORDER 5*** Unilateral PROPOSED CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by John King Howell, IV. (LAW) (Not signed by the plaintiff) Modified text on 12/16/2025 (MGB). Modified on 12/18/2025 to edit text and to remove document per Order 5. (JVC) |
Filing 3
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/1/2025. (WRW)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by John King Howell, IV. (LAW) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by John King Howell, IV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.