Edward v. Rodriguez et al
| Dredon Deronte Edward |
| Sgt. L Rodriguez and Officer Davis |
| 2:2026cv00579 |
| March 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Dredon Deronte Edward. Related case(s): No (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JTM)
|
|
Filing 5
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Dredon Deronte Edward. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JTM)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all confined pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/13/2026. (CAW)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Summons by Dredon Deronte Edward. (JTM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell.
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dredon Deronte Edward. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell.
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Davis, L Rodriguez filed by Dredon Deronte Edward. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Mailing Envelope)(JTM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
