Pringle v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Matthew Allen Pringle |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2026cv00585 |
| March 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Douglas N Frazier |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: See Order for deadlines and Court requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier on 3/4/2026. (MLD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Carol Ann Avard on behalf of Matthew Allen Pringle. Lead Counsel: Carol Avard. (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Matthew Allen Pringle. Related case(s): No (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Matthew Allen Pringle. (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier. New case number: 2:26-cv-585-DNF. (AA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24544874). The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Matthew Allen Pringle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Avard, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
