Ramirez Socorro v. Warden, Florida Soft Side South Detention Center et al
| Raul Ramirez Socorro |
| Warden, Florida Soft Side South Detention Center and US Attorney General |
| 2:2026cv00826 |
| March 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| John E Steele |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
REPLY re #4 Response to habeas petition by Raul Ramirez Socorro. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
|
Filing 6
PROOF of service - Attorney General of the United States served on 4/7/2026. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 4
RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Howard-Allen, Kelley)
|
|
Filing 5
PROOF of service - Warden Southside Det. Facility served on 4/6/26. (LSS)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. The Clerk is directed to serve the petition. The Petitioner has 14 days to reply to the response to petition. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/27/2026. (KLS)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number 17454) filed by Raul Ramirez Socorro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
