Dely v. Davis et al
| Edner Dely |
| Sinclair Davis and Luc Pierre-Charles |
| 2:2026cv00902 |
| March 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT entered dismissing case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 4/9/2026. (MCB) |
Filing 2
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. Dely did not properly initiate a civil action in this Court. To the extent Dely seeks to file a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. 1983, he is advised that the Court has approved the use of a complaint form for cases filed by prisoners under 1983. L.R. 6.04(a). Dely may pursue a new case by filing a proper complaint--not using this case number--and include the filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Dely a blank 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner complaint form. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to enter judgment, deny any pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and close this case. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 4/7/2026. (LTG)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Edner Dely. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) No service copies or IFP received. (FLY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
