Santiesteban Matos v. Ripa et al (Glades)
| Miguel Ariel Santiesteban Matos |
| Director of Field Garrett J. Ripa, Secretary Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting US Atty Gen Todd Blanche, Executive Office For Immigration Review and Warden Glades County Detention Center |
| 2:2026cv01297 |
| April 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Douglas N Frazier |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PROOF of service - Attorney General of the United States served on 5/4/2026. (LNR)
|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT denying Miguel Ariel Santiesteban Matos' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Deputy Clerk (LD)
|
Filing 8
OPINION AND ORDER. Santiesteban Matos's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1) is DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, enter judgment, and close this case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/22/2026. (SAP)
|
Filing 7
Case Reassigned to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell. New case number: 2:26-cv-1297-SPC-DNF. District Judge Kyle C. Dudek no longer assigned to the case. (LF)
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER. Before the Court is Petitioner Miguel Areil Santiesteban Matos's Second Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. #1). United States District Sheri Polster Chappell granted Petitioner's first petition and is thus familiar with the factual and procedural background of this case. Per Middle District of Florida Local Rule 1.07(a)(2)(A), this related, later-filed action is transferred to the Honorable Sheri Polster Chappell, with her consent, for all further purposes. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to REASSIGN this case to United States District Judge Sheri Polster Chappell. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 5/14/2026. (BLW)
|
Filing 5
RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Garrett J. Ripa, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Keefe, Sean)
|
Filing 4
PROOF of service - Garret Ripa, et. al. served on 04/27/2026. (Gomez, Diego)
|
Filing 3
ORDER to show cause why Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) should not be granted. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order, the Petition, with exhibits (Doc. 1) electronically to the United States Attorney's Office in Tampa, Florida ([email protected]) and by certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C (U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20530-0001). Petitioner is also directed to serve this order on Respondents by 4/30/2026, and file proof of service. Petitioner does not need to obtain a summons to do so. Respondents are DIRECTED to Show Cause by 5/13/2026. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 4/23/2026. (CGW)
|
Filing 2
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to District Judge Kyle C. Dudek and Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier. New case number: 2:26-cv-1297-KCD-DNF. (LMF)
|
Filing 1
Second PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - FEDERAL (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-24823950) filed by Miguel Ariel Santiesteban Matos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit First Habeas Petition Grant, #3 Exhibit IJ Initial Bond Denial Order, #4 Exhibit IJ Bond Memorandum)(Gomez, Diego) Modified text on 4/22/2026 (LMF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.