Hatcher v. Taylor Correctional Institution et al
| Mark Eugene Hatcher |
| Taylor Correctional Institution, R. G. Pinder and S. M. Sapone |
| 2:2026cv01388 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Kevin R Huguelet |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the Northern District of Florida as case 4:26-cv-00228, filed 05/12/2026. (JNB) |
| Filing 4 CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Florida. (LF) |
| Filing 3 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Huguelet. New case number: 2:26-cv-01388-KCD-KRH. Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier no longer assigned to the case. (JNG) |
Filing 2
ORDER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this case to the Tallahassee Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and close the Fort Myers case. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 5/4/2026. (LTG)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. G. Pinder, S. M. Sapone, Taylor Correctional Institution filed by Mark Eugene Hatcher. No IFP. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
