Baumann v. Westphal et al
| John Morton Baumann |
| Elaine Marie Westphal, Kathleen A. Smith and The Pavilion At Healthpark, LLC doing business as Park Royal Hospital |
| 2:2026cv02122 |
| July 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Amanda Thoele and Justin Seth Drach of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LAW) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Kathleen A. Smith, The Pavilion At Healthpark, LLC, Elaine Marie Westphal. (LAW) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to District Judge Kyle C. Dudek and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:26-cv-02122-KCD-NPM. (LAW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25199084) filed by John Morton Baumann. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Drach, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.