Petrosky v. GOATED Golf LLC et al
| Kenneth Petrosky |
| GOATED Golf LLC, Kevin J. Vanduser, Jr. and Christopher Meehan |
| 2:2026cv02402 |
| August 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Kevin R Huguelet |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to GOATED Golf LLC, Christopher Meehan, Kevin J. Vanduser, Jr. (ABM) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Huguelet. New case number: 2:26-cv2402-SPC-KRH. (ABM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Matthew Ryan Gunter of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ABM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GOATED Golf LLC, Christopher Meehan, Kevin J. Vanduser, Jr. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25439905) filed by Kenneth Petrosky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons GOATED Golf LLC, #3 Proposed Summons Kevin J. Vanduser Jr., #4 Proposed Summons Christopher Meehan)(Gunter, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.