Swenson v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
| Alexander Robert Swenson |
| Progressive Direct Insurance Company |
| 2:2026cv02668 |
| September 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Leslie Vega of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LAW) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Leslie Vega of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LAW) |
| Filing 6 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:26-cv-02668-SPC-NPM. (LAW) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. Filed in State Court on 7/15/2026.(LAW) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Progressive Direct Insurance Company with Jury Demand. filed by Alexander Robert Swenson. Filed in State Court on 9/16/2026.(LAW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. Related case(s): No (Gubernat, Jesse) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jesse Thomas Gubernat on behalf of Progressive Direct Insurance Company. Lead Counsel: Jesse Gubernat. (Gubernat, Jesse) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Lee County, Florida, case number 26-CA-003205 filed in State Court on 06/04/2026. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-25601486 filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Gubernat, Jesse) Modified text on 9/24/2026 (LAW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Swenson v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Robert Swenson | |
| Represented By: | Leslie Vega |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progressive Direct Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Thomas Gubernat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
