Coffey et al v. Braddy et al
3:1971cv00044 |
January 26, 1971 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Jacksonville Office |
Timothy J. Corrigan |
Thomas E. Morris |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (DO NOT USE) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 180 ORDER denying 6 MOTION to hold the City of Jacksonville in contempt, granting 16 MOTION to dissolve decree and dismiss case; dissolving decree and directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 2/16/2015. (SRW) |
Filing 62 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion, confirming Potter, Sanders, Johnson as class members and naming them class representatives, denying motion without prejudice as to West (plaintiffs' showing re: original representatives 9; unavailability due 4/7/09); granting 53 Motion to appoint counsel Thompson and Bishop as class counsel; finding as moot 55 Motion to intervene; granting 6 Motion for order to show cause to extent that case is set for evidentiary hearing on 6/30/09 at 9:30 a.m., Courtroom 10D; Clerk to reopen file; telephone hearing set for 4/21/09 at 9:30 a.m. (counsel for plaintiffs to initiate the call). Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 3/6/2009.(SRW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Coffey et al v. Braddy et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.