CSX Transportation, Inc. v. United Transportation Union et al
| 3:2005cv00672 |
| July 19, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Henry Lee Adams |
| Thomas E. Morris |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 Railway Labor Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, restraining defendants and all persons in active concert or participating with them from ordering, encouraging, inducing, attempting to induce, condoning, or participating in any work stoppage or slowdown at CSX or its su bsidiaries or affiliates (See Order for further provisions); the Temporary Restraining Order is conditioned upon a bond being filed by CSX in the amount of $50,000; the Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in effect until 4:00 p.m. 7/29/05; a preliminary injunction hearing is set for 7/28/05 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 10A, all papers filed pursuant to the preliminary injunction hearing must be filed by 4:00 p.m. 7/26/05. Signed by Judge Henry Lee Adams Jr. on 7/20/2005. (MO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. United Transportation Union et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
