APR Energy, LLC v. Pakistan Power Resources, LLC et al
Plaintiff: APR Energy, LLC
Defendant: Pakistan Power Resources, LLC, Walters Power International, LLC and Associated Group
Case Number: 3:2008cv00961
Filed: October 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Duval
Presiding Judge: Howell W. Melton
Presiding Judge: Monte C. Richardson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1391 Not to be used for cause

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 221 ORDER denying as moot 214 Motion to strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 11/16/2009. (MOH)
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 187 ORDER adopting 124 Report and Recommendation; denying in part and granting in part 99 Motion to Dismiss. The Motion is denied as to Counts I, II, and III. The motion is granted as to Counts VI and VII. Signed by Judge Henry Lee Adams, Jr. on 8/28/2009. (MO)
August 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER denying without prejudice 152 Motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 8/14/2009. (MOH)
May 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 124 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 99 MOTION to dismiss First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Pakistan Power Resources, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 5/21/2009. (MOH)
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER granting 118 Motion to seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 4/7/2009. (MOH)
February 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment and denying as moot 34 Motion to Dissolve, 35 Motion to Dissolve, 41 Motion for discovery, 72 Motion for leave to file, and 92 Motion for sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 2/20/2009. (MOH)
January 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER denying 42 Motion to strike ; denying 42 Motion for more definite statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 1/14/2009. (MOH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: APR Energy, LLC v. Pakistan Power Resources, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: APR Energy, LLC
Represented By: Harold E. Patricoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pakistan Power Resources, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walters Power International, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Associated Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?