EHR Aviation, Inc. v. Starwood Aviation, Inc. et al
EHR Aviation, Inc. |
Starwood Aviation, Inc. and Craig Lawson |
3:2009cv00210 |
March 6, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
Duval |
Timothy J. Corrigan |
Thomas E. Morris |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER granting 35 Motion for entry of Clerk's default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 5/12/2011. (JE) |
Filing 32 ORDER denying without prejudice 31 Motion for entry of default. Plaintiff shall have until March 24, 2011 within which to effectuate substitute service of process as provided for herein. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 1/6/2011. (JE) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 12 Amended Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 3/1/2010. (JMM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/2/2010: # 1 Main Document) (TS). Modified on 3/2/2010 (Document replaced per Chambers) (TS). |
Filing 15 ORDER reserving ruling on 12 Amended Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff shall file supplemental information by February 1, 2010. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 12/23/2009. (JMM) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting 13 Motion to extend time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 12/16/2009. (JE) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.