Bory et al v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
| Joseph Bory and Maureen Bory |
| U.S. Railroad Retirement Board |
| 3:2009cv01149 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Duval |
| Howell W. Melton |
| Monte C. Richardson |
| None |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER granting 94 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 104 Motion challenging reasonableness of fees; and directing Clerk to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 9/25/2013. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER granting 68 Plaintiffs' Motion for summary judgment; denying 69 Defendant's Motion for summary judgment; and setting schedule for filing motion for attorney's fees and response. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 3/20/2013. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 40 Motion to stay discovery and directing the filing of a Case Management Report by April 4, 2011. Signed by Senior Judge Howell W. Melton on 3/7/2011. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 25 Motion for summary judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Howell W. Melton on 12/8/2010. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 9 Motion to dismiss with leave to amend as to Count I by 5/5/10. Signed by Senior Judge Howell W. Melton on 4/14/2010. (JAE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
