Chamberlain v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
| 3:2009cv10809 |
| February 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Joel B. Toomey |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
AMENDED JUDGMENT. Judgment shall be, and hereby is, entered in favor of Defendants, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Individually and as Successorby Merger to The Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and Lorillard Tobacco Company, against Lawrence C hamberlain dismissing all claims with prejudice with costs and with an award of legal fees in the amount of $53,100 to each of the said two defendants, a total of $106,200. This Order shall be deemed to be a final judgment within the meaning of Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Sr. Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 5/28/2014. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
258
JUDGMENT. See Order for details. Signed by Sr. Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 11/19/2013. (LMF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chamberlain v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
