NetJets Aviation, Inc. et al v. Peter Sleiman Development Group, LLC et al
Plaintiff: NetJets Aviation, Inc. and NetJets Sales, Inc.
Defendant: Peter Sleiman Development Group, LLC and Peter Sleiman, Individually
Case Number: 3:2010cv00483
Filed: June 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Jacksonville Office
County: Duval
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge MMH
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER granting 140 Motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 10/25/2012. (MOH)
June 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER denying 118 Motion for sanctions; granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion to compel; and denying 123 Motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 6/20/2012. (MOH)
May 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 116 Motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 5/16/2012. (MOH)
December 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 97 Motion to compel; granting in part and denying in part 98 Motion to compel. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 12/27/2011. (BEE)
December 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER denying 93 Motion to quash or Motion for protective order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 12/22/2011. (MOH)
September 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER denying 67 Motion to dismiss; denying 80 Motion for sanctions; directing defendants Peter Sleiman Development Group, LLC and Peter Sleiman to file answers to the third amended complaint no later than 10/17/2011; granting 87 motion to modify case schedule; amended scheduling order to issue separately. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 9/27/2011.(SRW)
February 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting 39 Motion to quash. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey on 2/28/2011. (ADM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NetJets Aviation, Inc. et al v. Peter Sleiman Development Group, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NetJets Aviation, Inc.
Represented By: David Michael Gagnon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NetJets Sales, Inc.
Represented By: David Michael Gagnon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Sleiman Development Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Sleiman, Individually
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?