White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. v. Gaffin Industrial Services, Inc. et al
White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. |
Gaffin Industrial Services, Inc., American Safety Risk Retention Group, Inc. and American Safety Indemnity Company |
3:2011cv00998 |
October 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Jacksonville Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Timothy J. Corrigan |
James R. Klindt |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 91 Gaffin Industrial Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment on Cross-Claim against Defendant American Safety Risk Retention Group, Inc. On or before 5/1/2015, the parties shall file a joint notice on the status of the case. The Clerk should administratively close the case. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 3/10/2015. (BJB) |
Filing 87 ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and deferring in part 51 White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc's Motion for Summary Judgment As To Defendant Gaffin Industrial Services, Inc; granting in part, denying in part, and deferring in part 75 Gaffin Industrial Services, Inc.'s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. No later than 3/31/2014, the parties should file a joint notice advising the Court how they propose to proceed with the remaining issues, including whether further settlement efforts should now be undertaken. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 3/6/2014. (BJB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.