Adeniji v. City of Jacksonville Victim Service Center et al
| Dianne Roberta Adeniji |
| City of Jacksonville Victim Service Center, City of Jacksonville Welfare Department and City of Jacksonville Transit Authority |
| 3:2012cv00763 |
| July 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Duval |
| Thomas E. Morris |
| Harvey E. Schlesinger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 10 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, contained in the Amended Affidavit of Indigency (Dkt. 9) is Denied; This case is Dismissed without prejudice; Plain tiff shall have fourteen ( 14) days from the date of this Order in which to file an Second Amended Complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 12/11/2012. (PAM)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing compliance of pro se litigant with the provisions of this Order, as well as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules of the Middle District of Florida, and any applicable statutes and regulations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 7/25/2012. (DLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
