Hancock Bank v. Nichols Creek Development, L.L.C. et al
| Hancock Bank |
| Nichols Creek Development, L.L.C., Novorra D. Redmond, Ricky L. Mitchell, J.D. Mitchell, Hill Street, L.L.C., Hawkins Avenue Corporation, Stokes Holding, LLLP and R2S, LLC |
| 3:2013cv00026 |
| January 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Howell W. Melton |
| Joel B. Toomey |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
199
ORDER granting 134 Hancock's Motion for Final Summary Judgment against Borrower, Guarantors, and Hawkins as to Counts I-VI and finding as moot Count VII; granting 135 Hancock's Motion for Summary Judgment against Stokes and R2S; and denying 173 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. By 1/19/16, Hancock shall file a proposed final judgment consistent with this Order and including any demand for attorneys' fees and costs. By 1/19/16, Nichols Cree k and Stokes shall file brief notices with the Court stating how they intend to proceed regarding Count II of Stokes's crossclaim. By 1/28/16, any party may file objections to the proposed final judgment. The stay is lifted, and the Clerk should reopen the file. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 12/29/2015. (SEJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
