United Subcontractors, Inc. v. Darsey et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District United Subcontractors, Inc. v. Darsey et al

United Subcontractors, Inc. v. Darsey et al

Plaintiff:	United Subcontractors, Inc.
Defendant:	Jim Romeka, Randy Darsey, Construction Solutions & Supply, LLC and James Guilmette
Case Number:	3:2013cv00603
Filed:	May 24, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Jacksonville Office
County:	Duval
Presiding Judge:	Monte C. Richardson
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned Judge TJC
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 10, 2014	Filing 141 ORDER denying Defendant's Objection to Non-Dispositive Order 126 and finding that the Magistrate Judge's decision to strike the errata sheets was correct. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 1/10/2014. (WG)
January 8, 2014	Filing 139 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 134 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 1/8/2014. (MOH)
November 5, 2013	Filing 117 ORDER denying 108 Motion to file revised errata sheets. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 11/5/2013. (MOH)
October 24, 2013	Filing 112 ORDER denying 103 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 10/24/2013. (MOH)
June 20, 2013	Filing 42 ORDER granting in part 31 Motion to Compel Expedited Discovery and Sanctions; finding as moot 40 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 6/20/2013. (BEE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United Subcontractors, Inc. v. Darsey et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Romeka
Represented By:	Mary Lou Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Randy Darsey
Represented By:	Mary Lou Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Construction Solutions & Supply, LLC
Represented By:	Mary Lou Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: James Guilmette
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United Subcontractors, Inc.
Represented By:	C. Whitfield Caughman
Represented By:	Brett T. Lane
Represented By:	David W. Long-Daniels
Represented By:	Richard C. McCrea, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?