Grimage v. Whitehead et al
| Michael Eugene Grimage, B. Whitehead, D Hilliard and Tollick |
| G. A. Espino |
| 3:2013cv00935 |
| August 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Thomas E. Morris |
| Unassigned Judge MMH |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER granting 85 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to the claim that Defendant Tollick, in her individual capacity, was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's serious medical needs; dismissing Defendant Tollick fr om the action with prejudice; Judgment to that effect will be withheld pending adjudication of the action as a whole; granting 85 with respect to the Eighth Amendment excessive use of force claim against Defendant Hilliard with regard to the April 5, 2013 incident; with respect to any claim of verbal abuse; and with respect to any claim for injunctive relief; denying 85 Hilliard's motion for summary judgment in all other respects; the remaining claim is Defendant Hilliard, in his individual capacity, used excessive force against Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment on April 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 12/5/2016. (LDO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
