Eiras v. State of Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverage and Tobacco et al
| Christopher J. Eiras |
| State of Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverage and Tobacco and Eugene R. Baker, Jr. |
| 3:2016cv00231 |
| March 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Duval |
| Patricia D. Barksdale |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 58 Plaintiff's Request for Oral Argument; granting 57 Defendant Eugene R. Baker, Jr.'s Motion for Final Summary Judgment; directing the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment and close the file. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 2/4/2019. (JW)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 20 Defendant State of Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation's Second Motion to Dismiss Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint; denying 21 Defendant Eugene R. Baker, Jr.'s Second Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint. Count V of the Complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 10/13/2017. (JW)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER striking 16 Defendant DB&PR's Amended Motion to Dismiss Counts III and V of Plaintiff's Complaint and 17 Plaintiff's Response to Defendant State of Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulations Amended Motion to Dismiss Counts III and V of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 17); granting in part and denying in part 4 Defendant DB&PR's Motion to Dismiss Counts III and V of Plaintiff's Complaint; and granting in part and denying in part 6 Defendant Baker's Motion to Dismiss Counts I, II and IV of Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 3/7/2017. (DS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eiras v. State of Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverage and Tobacco et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher J. Eiras | |
| Represented By: | Wilfried Hermann Florin |
| Represented By: | Neil Patrick O'Brien |
| Represented By: | Thomas D. Roebig, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverage and Tobacco | |
| Represented By: | Candace Weeks Padgett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eugene R. Baker, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Paul Michael Eza |
| Represented By: | Michael Lee Glass |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
