O'Quinn v. Anderson et al
| Joseph O'Quinn |
| Sykes, Ford, Swift, Mcneil, Grimes and Morris |
| 3:2016cv01478 |
| November 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Patricia D. Barksdale |
| Brian J. Davis |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER granting 97 Defendant's Motion for Sanctions to the extent that this case is dismissed without prejudice, with instructions to the Clerk; denying 108 Plaintiff's request for sanctions and compensatory relief; if Plaintiff chooses to initiate another case based upon the same or similar facts/issues, he is precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis in such case, with further instructions. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 8/23/2018. (LDO)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting Defendants Anderson, Grimes, Ford, McNeil, Morris, Mallard, Sikcier, and Swift's 42 56 Motions to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; granting Defendants Anderson, Grimes, McNeil, Morris, Mallard, Sikci er, and Swift's 42 56 Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; dismissing Defendants Anderson, Grimes, Ford, McNeil, Morris, Mallard, Sikcier, and Swift; Defendant Sykes shall respond to the Amended Complaint by September 25, 2017.. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 9/14/2017. (LDO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
