Lenz v. Baker County Detention Center et al
| Daniel Ellis Moses Lenz |
| US Federal Justice Dept., US Marshall Service, Baker County Detention Center and US Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 3:2018cv01074 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| James R Klindt |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT that pursuant to this Court's Order entered October 29, 2018, Judgment is hereby entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/30/2018. (JSG) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 10/29/2018. (JLD)
|
| Mail returned as Undeliverable re: #2 Related case order and track 1 notice. Mail resent to Daniel Ellis Moses Lenz at FCI Petersburg. (JSG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 9/21/2018. (MD) |
| Mail returned as Undeliverable re: courtesy copy of docket sheet. Mail resent to Daniel Ellis Moses Lenz at USP Atlanta. (JSG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Daniel Ellis Moses Lenz (no IFP; no service copies received).(JSG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
