Pryce-Jones v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
| Sabina Pryce-Jones |
| United of Omaha Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2018cv01083 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| James R Klindt |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company.(Furman, Wendy) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including 10/31/2018 to respond to the Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt on 10/16/2018. (MDC)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. Related case(s): no (Furman, Wendy) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company for United of Omaha Life Insurance Company.. (Furman, Wendy) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (Furman, Wendy) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on 9-26-2018 by Sabina Pryce-Jones as to United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (Demas, William) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Sabina Pryce-Jones. (Demas, William) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Sabina Pryce-Jones. Related case(s): no (Demas, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 (ERISA). Signed by Deputy Clerk on 9/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Letter and Form)(JW) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (BD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number JAX028937) filed by Sabina Pryce-Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(BD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pryce-Jones v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Wendy L. Furman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sabina Pryce-Jones | |
| Represented By: | William Chris Demas |
| Represented By: | John V. Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
